Third party instances of Framaslides (like a yunohost framaslides package)
Further to this discussion on mastodon https://mastodon.social/@yunohost/16496449 I open a ticket as the official yunohost package maintainer of the strut app.
We have started this discussion because we weren't sure you would be ok with the idea we are going to create a package "framaslides" (and a framadate too) for YunoHost. Our idea is to replace the strut one's because framaslides is better (good job :) ). From our point of view the risk is the confusion between your official instance of framaslides and the future selfhosted instances of framaslides, if we create this package. That's why we weren't sure it would be ok for you. That's why we asked the question about the "framanames".
But, it seems, following the discussion on mastodon, you would prefer to kept the framaslides name. If I understood well you will be ok with the idea of selfhosted "framaslides".
If you confirm it's your position (I might misunderstood), I think I could propose you some small Merge Request to allow an administrator to adapt some email or html templates. Like that we could try to avoid users from believing there are on the official framaslides.org...
Here is a small research that show some things to change: https://framagit.org/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&search=frama&group_id=&project_id=9480&search_code=true&repository_ref=master
The most important:
Les données sont hébergées sur les serveurs de <b class="frama">Frama</b><b class="soft">soft</b>."
Some frama emails hardcoded in src/Strut/UserBundle/DataFixtures/ORM/LoadUserData.php
The validation email app/Resources/FOSUserBundle/translations/FOSUserBundle.fr.yml "
Nous vous rappelons que si ce service est gratuit" We need another sentences to encourage to donate to Framasoft... This one is unappropriated because some yunohost instances are not free and works with open pricing. I think we should separate the hosting from the development service.