Commit bc4f6979 authored by Stéphane Bortzmeyer's avatar Stéphane Bortzmeyer

Remarks by John Levine

parent ffa01ca5
...@@ -101,7 +101,10 @@ ...@@ -101,7 +101,10 @@
described in RFC 1034 <xref target="RFC1034"/> and RFC&nbsp;1035 described in RFC 1034 <xref target="RFC1034"/> and RFC&nbsp;1035
<xref target="RFC1035"/> and with the DNS DNAME Resource Record <xref target="RFC1035"/> and with the DNS DNAME Resource Record
type described in RFC 6672 <xref target="RFC6672"/> is required type described in RFC 6672 <xref target="RFC6672"/> is required
to understand the DNS concepts described in this document.</t> to understand the DNS concepts described in this
document. (DNAME have properties that may be surprising at
first; for instance, it aliases only the subdomains, not the
owner name of the DNAME record itself.)</t>
<t>The EPP mapping described in this document specifies a mechanism <t>The EPP mapping described in this document specifies a mechanism
for the provisioning and management of domain names in a for the provisioning and management of domain names in a
...@@ -501,7 +504,8 @@ END ...@@ -501,7 +504,8 @@ END
<section title="Acknowledgements" anchor="acks"> <section title="Acknowledgements" anchor="acks">
<t>Most of the text has been copied from <xref <t>Most of the text has been copied from <xref
target="RFC5910"/>, so thanks to its authors.</t> target="RFC5910"/>, so thanks to its authors.</t>
<t>Thanks to James Gould for a detailed review.</t> <t>Thanks to James Gould for a detailed review and for
John Levine for good remarks.</t>
</section> </section>
</middle> </middle>
...@@ -538,6 +542,9 @@ END ...@@ -538,6 +542,9 @@ END
EPP server registers only delegations, either through NS records EPP server registers only delegations, either through NS records
or, as here, a DNAME record. This keeps the mapping much or, as here, a DNAME record. This keeps the mapping much
simpler.</t> simpler.</t>
<t>For this reason, the possibility to add other resource
records together with the DNAME (<xref target="RFC6672"/>,
section 2.4) is out-of-scope here.</t>
</section> </section>
<?rfc rfcedstyle="yes"?> <?rfc rfcedstyle="yes"?>
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment